1. Summary
"Purple Haze" is a name rather than a documented cultivar. It comes from Jimi Hendrix's 1967 song and was also a name for LSD. High Times' 1986β1988 reader price surveys list "purple haze" only as LSD, and a full-text search of High Times issues 1984β1989 found no cannabis strain of that name.1 The modern claim that it is Haze Γ Purple Thai is folklore: no breeder, date or primary source has been found.23 Alternative versions (an Afghani phenotype Γ Haze; Purple Thai Γ Super Silver Haze) are equally unsourced.3 One Santa Cruz account says the magenta "Rootbeer" phenotype of Original Haze was what "the rest of the world knew as 'purple haze'" (reported).4
2. Identity
- Aliases: Purple Haze #1. Many unrelated seed-company "Purple Haze" lines exist.
- Type: marketed as a sativa.
- Breeder: unknown.
- Era: the name dates from 1967; its use as a strain name is undocumented before modern catalogues.
3. Genetics & lineage claims
- 3a. Haze Γ Purple Thai β folklore.23
- 3b. Afghani phenotype Γ Haze, or Purple Thai Γ SSH β folklore.3
- 3c. The magenta phenotype of Original Haze β reported.4
4. Timeline
- 1967 β Hendrix, "Purple Haze".5
- 1986β1988 β "Purple haze" appears as LSD in High Times price surveys.1
- 1990s onward β Seed-catalogue cannabis lines under the name (first date unverified).
- 2014β2017 β WA tests (n=170), including 28 tests of "Pickens Mtn. Purple Haze".
5. Notable cuts / phenotypes / remakes
These are unrelated commercial lines, for example United Cannabis Seeds and Zamnesia (listed by aggregators), plus a WA producer cut, "Pickens Mtn".3
6. Historical descriptions by era
No dated pre-2000 cannabis descriptions were found.
7. Cannabinoid & terpene profile
| Label | Measure | n | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Smith 2022 | THC mean 17.5%; myrcene-dominant 8/13, caryophyllene 4/13 | 100 (13 with terpenes) | Smith 2022 data |
| WA I-502 | THC mean 17.7% | 170 | WA I-502 |
The myrcene-led profile differs from the terpinolene-led Haze labels. That is consistent with the name being applied to unrelated plants. Strain names are not reliable chemotype identifiers.
8. Community sentiment
No consumer review corpus could be accessed: Leafly returned 403 and Reddit was not sampled. The recurring themes are the iconic, nostalgic name (common) and uncertainty about what it actually is (occasional). Overall score: withheld.
9. Open questions
- The earliest seed-catalogue use of the name (1990s catalogues were not checked).
- Any breeder claiming to have made the original.
10. Sources
Lab: src-chem-smith2022-data, src-chem-wa-i502-jikomes2018.
Footnotes
-
High Times Trans-High Market price surveys, Aug 1986 (No. 132), Sep 1986 (No. 133), Sep 1988 (No. 157), Oct 1988 (No. 158); full-text search of Nos. 100β172. https://archive.org/details/high-times-magazine-1980s_202401 β news. β© β©2
-
Dispensary 33, "Purple Haze". https://dispensary33.com/cannabis/flower/bedford_grow/purple-haze β secondary_database β unverified_url: true. β© β©2
-
Joint Commerce, "Purple Haze strain guide". https://www.jointcommerce.com/blog/purple-haze-strain-a-comprehensive-strain-guide β secondary_database β unverified_url: true. β© β©2 β©3 β©4 β©5
-
BigHerb, "The True Origins of Haze", THCFarmer, 2011-11-15. https://www.thcfarmer.com/threads/the-true-origins-of-haze.42427/ β forum_post. β© β©2
-
Weedmaps, "Purple Haze". https://weedmaps.com/strains/purple-haze β secondary_database β unverified_url: true. β©